Share on Facebook
Share on X
Share on LinkedIn
By Letisha D. Sailor, Esq. LL.M., Taxation
Founder & Managing Member
Whether a flight triggers the 7.5% federal excise tax turns on a single question: Is it commercial transportation for hire, or noncommercial use of your own aircraft? Charters carry the tax plus a per-segment fee, while private flights on your own aircraft are taxed instead through higher fuel rates.

The IRS notice arrives months after a busy charter season, and the 7.5 percent you never collected is suddenly a five-figure liability with penalties attached. Federal excise tax on aircraft turns on one question: Was the flight commercial transportation for hire, or noncommercial use of your own aircraft? Charter flights generally carry a 7.5 percent tax plus a per-segment fee, while noncommercial flying is taxed instead through higher fuel rates. A Florida aviation tax attorney at AvTax Advisors, PLLC can map your operation to the right regime before a notice ever lands.

How Does the Federal Excise Tax Apply to Aircraft Flights?

Federal excise tax applies to aircraft flights in two distinct ways, and which one governs depends on whether the flight is commercial or noncommercial. For commercial transportation of passengers, a 7.5 percent tax applies to the amount paid to carry persons by air, plus a domestic segment fee that the IRS adjusts annually for inflation, set at $5.30 per flight segment in 2026. Transportation of property by air for hire carries a separate 6.25 percent tax.

International flights, those that begin or end in the United States but cross a U.S. border, are taxed differently. Instead of the 7.5 percent passenger tax, they carry a per-person international facilities tax, set at $23.40 in 2026.

Noncommercial flying works differently. Instead of the percentage tax, the government collects revenue through higher fuel taxes. These aviation excise taxes fund the Airport and Airway Trust Fund, which Congress reauthorized through September 2028.

What Is the Difference Between Commercial and Noncommercial Aviation?

Commercial aviation means transporting persons or property for compensation or hire, while noncommercial aviation is any other use of an aircraft. This single distinction drives the entire tax analysis. Commercial flights are subject to the percentage transportation tax, and the kerosene they burn is taxed at the low commercial rate. Noncommercial flights avoid the transportation tax but pay a far higher fuel tax. Kerosene used in commercial aviation is taxed at a much lower rate than fuel used in noncommercial flying, 4.3 cents per gallon versus 21.8 cents (4.4 and 21.9 cents including the 0.1-cent LUST tax).

The tax code decides which category a flight falls into using the possession, command, and control test. When you pay an operator to fly you and that operator holds possession, command, and control of the aircraft, you have purchased taxable transportation. When you fly your own aircraft, you retain control, and the transportation tax does not apply.

Do Charter Flights Trigger the Federal Excise Tax?

Yes. A charter flight is commercial transportation for hire, so the 7.5 percent percentage tax and the per-segment fee apply to the amount the customer pays. The charter operator, not the passenger, is responsible for collecting the tax and remitting it to the IRS each quarter. Because the operator supplies the crew and controls the aircraft, the operator holds possession, command, and control, which is what makes the payment taxable.

This matters most when an aircraft owner lets a charter company use the aircraft to fly paying third parties. Those charter flights are taxable transportation, even though flights the owner takes on the same aircraft may be treated very differently. Tracking which flights are which is essential to staying compliant and to reporting the correct tax.

Are Payments to an Aircraft Management Company Taxable?

Usually not. Effective December 23, 2017, federal law has exempted amounts an aircraft owner pays to a management company for managing and supporting the owner’s aircraft, including flights on that aircraft, even when the owner is not aboard. Before this rule, the possession, command, and control test created years of uncertainty about whether routine management fees were really payments for taxable transportation.

The exemption is narrow. It does not cover payments by a related company within an affiliated group, and it does not apply to a disqualified lease, meaning a lease of 31 days or less from the management company itself. It also does not shield the third-party charter flights described above. Getting the ownership and management structure right is what keeps these payments exempt.

Which Exemptions Can Reduce Excise Tax Exposure?

Several narrow exemptions can change the analysis, and the right approach depends on how the aircraft is owned and used. Beyond the management services exemption, federal law provides relief for transportation by certain small aircraft operating on nonestablished lines, for flights among members of an affiliated group, and for aircraft in a fractional ownership program, where a fuel surtax applies in place of the transportation tax.

These rules interact in ways that are easy to misjudge, and a structure that works for one owner can create liability for another. Reviewing flight logs, ownership documents, and management agreements together is the only reliable way to confirm which tax applies to each flight.

Bring Clarity to Your Aircraft Tax Compliance

Federal excise tax mistakes tend to surface at the worst time (e.g., during an audit, after a sale, or once charter income has already been booked). AvTax Advisors helps private aircraft owners, operators, and businesses classify every flight correctly and structure ownership so the right tax applies. Contact AvTax Advisors, PLLC to schedule a consultation and protect your operation before questions arise.

About the Author
Letisha D. Sailor has over 20 years of aviation, tax, and accounting experience. Letisha has assisted hundreds of aircraft owners and operators with aviation tax planning to minimize state tax consequences, maximize federal tax deductions, meet FAA regulatory requirements, and ensure ongoing compliance with recordkeeping and reporting requirements. She has also assisted clients with structuring a vast number of aircraft transactions, including drafting and negotiating purchase/sales agreements, dry lease agreements, aircraft and charter management agreements, and co-ownership agreements. In addition to tax planning and structuring, Letisha has represented numerous aircraft owners and operators in all aspects of state and federal tax examinations, including representing clients during audit examinations and administrative appeals; negotiating with IRS and state revenue personnel to resolve tax assessments; and representing clients before the U.S. Tax Court and state courts and administrative tribunals. Prior to founding ATA, she was a Principal at GKG Law, P.C. (2023-2025) in the business aviation and tax practice group and a managing attorney at Advocate Consulting Legal Group, PLLC (“ACLG”), an aviation tax firm Letisha joined in 2009.