Founder & Managing Member
A double-blind trust is a layered aircraft title structure in which a trustee registers the aircraft with the FAA and the beneficiary of that trust is itself a second trust or entity rather than the person flying. The result is that a public registry search returns the trustee, and a look behind the trustee returns another layer instead of a name. Owners use it for security and competitive privacy. A Tampa aviation tax attorney can tell you whether the structure fits your ownership and tax goals.
How the Layered Structure Is Assembled
Start with an ordinary owner trust. An owner-trustee holds legal title to the aircraft and applies to register it, while the person or company that paid for the aircraft holds the beneficial interest. A registry search returns the trustee. Anyone who obtains the trust documents, however, can read the beneficiary’s name.
The second layer closes that gap. Instead of naming the purchaser as beneficiary, the trust names another trust or a separate entity, and the purchaser sits behind that second instrument. That is where the term double-blind comes from. One layer shields the registry, and the second shields the document a determined researcher would pull next.
Nothing about the arrangement is exotic. It is a stack of ordinary instruments, each doing a narrow job, and each adding cost, paperwork, and ongoing administration. The question worth asking is not whether the structure works mechanically. It is what the structure actually accomplishes and what it leaves untouched.
What the FAA Receives Regardless of the Layers
The federal aircraft registration rules treat trust ownership as a disclosure event. An applicant that holds legal title in trust must satisfy several requirements before the registry will issue a certificate, and those requirements reach the underlying paperwork, not just the registry entry.
- Each trustee must be a United States citizen or a resident alien.
- The application must include a copy of each document legally affecting a relationship under the trust.
- If every beneficiary is a citizen or resident alien, the applicant files an affidavit saying so.
- If any beneficiary is neither, each trustee must file a further affidavit. That affidavit states that the trustee is not aware of any reason, situation, or relationship that would give those persons together more than 25% of the aggregate power to influence or limit the exercise of the trustee’s authority.
- Where persons who are neither citizens nor resident aliens can direct or remove the trustee, the trust instrument itself must cap that combined power at 25%, though the same persons may hold more than 25% of the beneficial interest.
Read together, those rules make the point that most marketing material skips. The layers are built for the public, not for the agency. The registry receives the instruments. The certificate it issues is not evidence of ownership in a proceeding in which ownership is or may be in issue, so the underlying title and trust documents, rather than the registry entry, are what a court would look to.
The Federal Privacy Route That Now Runs Alongside It
Congress added a privacy section to the aviation programs subtitle of Title 49 of the United States Code in May 2024, and it changed the calculus for owners whose only goal is a quiet registry entry. The provision directs the FAA to build a procedure for withholding an owner’s personally identifiable information from broad dissemination or display, including on FAA websites. The FAA opened that process in March 2025, and private owners and operators can now ask the agency to keep registration details off public display through the Civil Aviation Registry Electronic Services system.
One detail is worth checking before you rely on that route. The statute defines protected information to include a mailing or registration address, an electronic address, a telephone number, and the name of the aircraft owner or operator when the owner or operator is an individual. On the face of the statute, an owner who registers personally sits squarely inside that definition. How the agency applies the same request when a trust or a company appears on the registry is still being worked out. The FAA request for comment that followed listed owner names without the individual qualifier, and it asked whether to withhold the data categorically. Confirm the current handling with the registry before you choose a structure on privacy grounds alone.
So the honest comparison is not trust versus nothing. It is a layered trust, with its ongoing cost and administrative load, measured against a federal request that carries no published fee and may already reach the exposure you are worried about.
Title Structure and Tax Treatment Are Separate Questions
A privacy structure is not a tax structure, and treating it as one is where owners get hurt. Federal law provides that where a person is treated as the owner of a portion of a trust, the items of income, deductions, and credits attributable to that portion are included in computing that person’s taxable income rather than disappearing into the trust. Adding layers does not by itself change who is taxed on those items, and whether the rule applies to a given arrangement depends on terms your tax counsel has to review.
State and local exposure follows the same logic. Sales tax, use tax, and property tax questions turn on where the aircraft is delivered, based, and used, and on how the flights are documented, not on how many instruments sit above the aircraft on paper. We plan those issues alongside the aircraft purchase and sale work rather than after closing, because the deal documents and the flight records are what an auditor eventually reads.
Questions to Settle Before You Sign
Before committing to a layered structure, work through the practical items with counsel. The answers usually reveal whether the arrangement is solving a problem you actually have.
- What exposure are you trying to reduce, and would the federal withholding request address it at a fraction of the cost?
- Who serves as trustee, and what are the annual fees, renewal duties, and replacement terms?
- Does any beneficiary or controlling person fall outside United States citizenship or residency, which triggers the affidavit and 25% ceiling requirements?
- How will lenders, insurers, and management companies react to the structure during underwriting?
- What happens on sale, refinancing, or death, when the layers have to be unwound quickly?
Work through those five items before the closing calendar starts driving decisions. A structure chosen under deadline pressure tends to survive for years, and unwinding it later costs more than getting it right the first time.
Talk With an Aviation Tax and Transactions Attorney
Every aircraft ownership structure trades cost and complexity for something. We help private owners, flight departments, and businesses weigh privacy, tax, and compliance goals against each other before the title decision is locked in. Contact AvTax Advisors to schedule a consultation about your aircraft ownership structure.
This article is general information, not legal or tax advice, and it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on facts that vary from one ownership structure to the next.